Chatting With Morning View's CEO & Dixon's City Manager

While I think it would be a mistake to let Morning View and the city go about their business without being questioned, I also think it’s unfair to oversimplify what goes into a project of this magnitude.


Dixon Patch ran two blog posts about the $2.8 billion Morning View film studio project last week.

The first piece, by Bil Paul, took a skeptical approach – questioning the transparency of the project and the speed with which it has been executed. Paul says he would like to see the project happen – “who wouldn’t?” – but says it’s still a mystery to him.

The second piece, by Mike Smith, ran the next day.  He aims to answer some questions about the past and the present, while also explaining the complex nature of a project this big – especially when it involves an industry such as film.

I won’t dive deep into either of those pieces; you can read them on your own if you want to. Instead, I’ll casually share some thoughts from a pair of conversations I had with Morning View's Carissa Carpenter and Dixon City Manager Jim Lindley. 

Both Carpenter and Lindley were casual and forthright when I spoke with them. These were more of converstaions than they were interviews, which is why you won't find quotes below. 

My own curiousity

In my chat with Carpenter, I told her about a Tribune story I read in December that sounded as if Morning View wanted to somehow prevent the community from discussing the project online. As the editor of an online publication where we encourage community participation, I found the article puzzling.

Locals are excited about this massive project, so curiosity and speculation are inevitable. Telling people not to talk about it seemed like the wrong way to go. 

But here’s what I took away from Carpenter's response, which I found to be satisfying: Morning View’s intention is not to silence the community; their intention is to build a movie studio in Dixon, and with that comes a variety of complex hurdles, one of which is signing contracts with people in the film industry – which City Manager Lindley told me is a sensitive industry built on connections.

People who are thinking of doing business in Dixon could be put in a tough place if their name ends up attached to a project like this before it becomes a tangible reality. Guessing and speculation might seem harmless to an online blogger or commenter in Dixon, but it might not feel that way to someone who intends to sign on with the studio -- a significant business decision. 

Which brings us to Measure N

Bil Paul’s blog post starts with the fact that six months have gone by and there have been no major visible developments on the project and little communication between Morning View and the people of Dixon. In a way he’s right, but it would be unfair to say it’s that simple:

The project came to a halt when Measure N landed on the ballot. Regardless of your thoughts on the measure, it was a deal breaker for Morning View, so they had to put things on hold until the election. When Measure N was defeated, they got back to work (during the holiday months – not the best time for getting business done).

So, any initial timetables Morning View announced prior to the election should be viewed through the lens of that reality.

As for transparency, Morning View is also working on an informative website which Carpenter said will be coming soon. Updates and details will be shared as they become available, and Dixon Patch will make sure to report developments as they unfold. 

As for a public forum, Carpenter mentioned that there will definitely be a time to get ideas from the community, but I didn't ask about a specific timetable or context. 

$100,000 to be deposited soon      

Lindley says that from his vantage point, progress is being made quickly – not slowly. Especially considering the stall created by Measure N. Lindley said that any day now, Morning View will wire $100,000 to the city to pay contractors and cover the city’s costs of working on the project.

Mike Smith said this is not a litmus test to see if Morning View is serious. It’s just one part of a very large process.

Here’s my takeaway

While I think it would be a mistake to let Morning View and the city go about their business without being questioned, I also think it’s unfair to oversimplify what goes into a project of this magnitude. 

We’re talking about a $2.8 billion, 300-acre film studio, with a goal of being finished by 2015. That’s a huge project to be executed in a very short time.

It's in Morning View's and the City's best interests to keep the community informed, because as long as this studio is up for discussion, people will be curious. People want to know about this potentially-huge addition to their city. 

To that same end, Dixonites should keep in mind the sheer size of the project and approach accordingly. 

What's Next

Lindley said he’d let me know when the $100,000 gets wired to the city. As soon as we hear from him, we'll share that on the site. If you have questions about the project, feel free to email us at dixon@patch.com. 

C. Duncan February 01, 2013 at 12:30 AM
Thank you, Justin. You are the most insightful and intelligent journalist involved with Dixon. I wish you wrote and reported more often. Cindy Duncan
Dane Besneatte February 02, 2013 at 04:48 AM
This is one of the best articles I have seen about this project and what is involved and many of the 'why' and 'what for' questions. Very well written and balanced thank you.
Gary Erwin February 02, 2013 at 06:30 PM
A new article is now available on Dixon Tribune Face Book page.
David A. Davis March 08, 2013 at 10:29 PM
SorryJustin. I don't think explanations like "a sensitive industry built on connections" and the idea that the film industry should be treated any differently than other industries is what the citizens of Dixon want to hear. Morning View is the master of over simplification. Concerned citizens want the opposite of what is implied in your article. Details that lend themselves to a clearer picture of what this project is really all about would go a long way in helping us understand the mystry behind Morning View. The idea that the size and scope of the project should somehow create a sense of urgency is simply wrong. "We will tell you who we are after you sell us your land " is why this project has been rejected for the last 10 years. I, like many others might be very much in favor of this endeavor if, as Bil Paul pointed out, enough information existed to come to an intelligent understanding of this colossal project. Opinions aside thanks for staying with this critical issue. Looking forward to your next article...


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »